I started reading my 3546 emails, and began to feel that being Famous is not all it's cracked up to be. Alexandra kindly agreed to look after them, as follows:
Hi, Lucien, you're so cute! BLOCK THIS SENDER
Allow me, my dear young friend, to recommend to you the grace and mercy of our BLOCK THIS SENDER
Hi, kid -- you took the first step by speaking out about our enemy and his vile hypocrisy. Now you need to BLOCK THIS SENDER
Boy, you're hot -- would you like to BLOCK THIS SENDER
She held on to a few that looked "genuine" -- nice to have such helpful friends.
The TV appearance went quite well. The truth was best -- George is mortified, but actually people would have imagined terrible things if I'd not given the unvarnished, and rather trivial, facts. And it's also best for self-protection.
http://www.metroweekly.com/news/last_word/2010/05/cnn-interviews-rent-boy-lucien.html
But now, I'm a Star! The sultry southern heartthrob, the new James Dean etc. Sort of thing that goes to a boy's head.
Mom said, 'You were great!'
Will the invitations roll in from Hollywood? Or will I be old news in a few days time?
George, you better do what Lucien tells you -- no more "antigay" nonsense -- and you should take up my offer of friendship. You won't find better!
A completely wacky site, the well-named forum.ship-of-fools.com failed to recognize that these "Lucien" postings are FICTION.
Posted by: Spirit of Vatican II | May 10, 2010 at 02:08 PM
Andrew Sullivan's campaign to have the lowdown on the sexual orientation of the new Supreme Court nominee strikes me as childish and obsessive. But he was decent about Lucien and George: "I have always found the coercive exposure of details of people's private sex lives to be appalling and cruel. Readers may have noticed that I have barely touched the story of George Rekers, just as I was not among those most eager to pounce on Larry Craig. My core reason is that exposing the complicated lives of people by single acts or humiliating moments is a form of cruelty, and no civil rights movement can or should be built on cruelty to others."
Posted by: Spirit of Vatican II | May 11, 2010 at 05:47 PM
Is Joseph O'Leary a layman or a priest? I ask for a number of reasons, not least that he seems to be the only person who gets through the moderation process at the ACP blog. Presumably, then, he's a priest.
Posted by: EditorCT | April 25, 2011 at 04:54 AM
Looks like your anti-Vatican 2 piece went through with only a slight delay -- a little bit of patience please!
Posted by: Spirit of Vatican II | April 25, 2011 at 05:15 PM